Rupert Murdoch (c) World Economic Forum |
….as
long as it suits them of course. But still.
Researching
emails
between Fred Michel and Jeremy Hunt's office for my earlier post, I
came across the following correspondence entitled 'Immigration cap -
meeting' between Michel and Giles Wilkes, special adviser to business
secretary, Vince Cable. On 10th
October 2010, Michel wrote to Wilkes:
...”I am writing to see if we could meet up to discuss the reform plans on the immigration cap. As you can imagine, it is a policy area which will have a major impact on News Corporation”.
Wilkes
responded sympathetically to this request, given the “major
impact this might have on News International”. He
added that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS)
were trying to get views on this matter from businesses across the
board, so that they could feed them into government policy.
On
12th
October, Wilkes told Michel that he could not meet him later that
week, but that he was interested in finding out News Internationals
thoughts on an immigration cap. Michel responds:
...”I will send you our first thoughts and hope we can be helpful on this debate. We are looking at it from a mobility viewpoint but also ability to hire talents for a global company etc. We also have some relevant expertise in-house on this”.
Correspondence
between the pair is rejoined on 21st
October, when Michel gave Wilkes a heads-up of the speech that Rupert
Murdoch was giving on global mobility at the inaugaral Margaret
Thatcher lecture later that night. And then it all went a little off
piste, after Wilkes asked Michel, “Out
of interest, are his editors in the audience as a rule”? “Cheeky!”,
retorted
Michel.
Cheeky (c) Johan Larsson |
Wilkes
apologised, stating that he had no intention of being cheeky, and
explained:
“But as I am sure you are aware, there is a strong anti-immigration feeling in the UK, and this is seen in some quarters as coming from the popular press. It would be interesting if the same sentiments that RM is expressing in the speech were to be amplified in your highly respected newspapers”.
Fair
point, Mr Wilkes. In his speech, Murdoch states:
“In short, Britain needs companies robust enough to compete in this global market – whether in finance or pharmaceuticals, transport or telecommunications, retail or entertainment. And we need to attract the brightest talent, regardless of background and ethnicity.
In other words, Britain should be a magnet for the best students and best workers from around the world”.
Was
it reported in Murdoch's media? Nothing appears online, so it
would appear that Murdoch and NewsCorp preferred to keep this quiet
in the UK. Strange.
Or is it?
Over
the last couple of years, the Murdochs
have expanded their operations in India. NewsCorp operate
through Star India Pvt Ltd, and they own stakes in a number of other
industries in India, including the Tata Group and Harper Collins. For
the Murdochs, India represents the future, and the
future looks promising.
Coincidentally,
Indian citizens need visas to work and study in the UK. Will NewsCorp
be sponsoring student applications from their commercial partners to
oil the wheels of commerce? Are NewsCorp already thinking ahead in
terms of their future workforce – will they insource their future
employees? Pure speculation on my part, but NewsCorp is a business
that plans ahead strategically when it comes to expansion.
The
government is already struggling to curb abuse
of student visas. It would seem quite disingenuous then for the
UK government to consider what might be best for the likes of
NewsCorp.
But
there again, who really holds the power when it comes to shaping
public opinion and policy? It will be interesting to see what steps
the government takes towards meeting their commitment of reducing net
immigration.
One
last thing. Feel free to circulate this piece more widely so that
NewsCorp subscribers (including readers of The Sun, Times etc.) and
shareholders are aware of NewsCorp's liberal immigration stance.
No comments:
Post a Comment